top of page

Breaking Down the 2023 DHS Language Access Plan: A Guide to PBNDS Applicability

Writer's picture: Alex H BereaAlex H Berea


DHS Language access plan - PBNDS - Compliance - Federal - ICE Detention
AI generated - 2023 DHS Language Access plan - PBNDS

The 2023 DHS Language Access Plan plays a critical role in ensuring that detainees with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) in ICE and USMS (United States Marshals Service) facilities have access to essential language services. To determine how the plan applies to specific Performance-Based National Detention Standards (PBNDS)—which guide ICE detention practices—facilities must assess the particular language access provisions outlined in various PBNDS editions and how they intersect with the broader federal mandates.


Steps for Determining Applicability:


1. Understand the Language Requirements in Each PBNDS Version:


Each version of the PBNDS outlines varying degrees of emphasis on language access. Understanding these differences is crucial to determining how the DHS Language Access Plan applies:


PBNDS 2000: This earlier version primarily focuses on overall compliance with federal regulations but has minimal specific language access requirements. As a result, facilities adhering to these standards will likely need to implement additional measures from the DHS plan.

PBNDS 2008: This edition introduces more explicit language access guidelines, requiring: a. translation of vital documents; and b. providing interpreters. Facilities following these standards must compare these obligations with the DHS mandates.


PBNDS 2011: Language access becomes more detailed, covering legal, medical, and grievance processes. For facilities governed by this version, the DHS Language Access Plan will enhance already robust provisions, especially for LEP detainees.


PBNDS 2019: The most recent standards build upon prior editions, ensuring more comprehensive language services, such as using technology for real-time interpreting and thorough data tracking of LEP detainees. Facilities adhering to the 2019 PBNDS will likely find significant overlap with the DHS plan, but may still need to address specific compliance gaps.


2. Cross-Reference the DHS Language Access Plan (2023) and PBNDS:


The DHS Language Access Plan (2023) establishes requirements across all DHS agencies, including ICE. To determine how it applies:


Section 3 of the DHS plan. It is a must, since it covers essential language services like qualified interpreters and translated documents. The 2023 plan emphasizes ensuring LEP individuals have meaningful access to services.

Compare the language access provisions of the PBNDS version governing the facility with the DHS plan. Facilities operating under the PBNDS 2019 or 2011 will likely meet many DHS requirements but should still assess areas such as staff training and service availability to avoid compliance issues.


3. Align the Specific Elements of the DHS Plan with PBNDS Requirements:


Once the relevant PBNDS version is understood, facilities can align it with the DHS Language Access Plan by placing a strong emphasis on the following:


PBNDS 2000 and 2008: These standards provide basic language access, primarily focusing on translation and interpretation for critical interactions. The DHS plan will expand these obligations, particularly regarding real-time language support and staff preparedness.


PBNDS 2011 and 2019: Facilities governed by these versions will benefit from the DHS plan’s emphasis on technology adoption, such as phone or video interpreting services, and tracking systems for LEP detainees to monitor service provision effectively.


3.1 A table to summarize PBNDS Applicability:

Language Access Component

PBNDS 2000

PBNDS 2008

PBNDS 2011

PBNDS 2019

2023 DHS Language Access Plan

Translation of Vital Documents

Basic, minimal requirements

Required for key documents

Required for vital documents

Comprehensive, mandatory for all key documents

Required for all vital documents across agencies

Access to Interpreters

Limited to essential cases

More detailed provisions, but not exhaustive

Mandatory for legal, medical, grievance processes

Required for all significant interactions (legal, medical, etc.)

Mandatory for all interactions with LEP individuals

Staff Training on Language Access

Not explicitly required

Suggested, but not mandatory

Encouraged with some specifications

Mandatory with explicit guidelines

Mandatory with continuous training

Data Tracking of LEP Detainees

Not addressed

Not clearly defined

Mentioned, but not in detail

Detailed tracking required

Explicit requirement for robust tracking

Use of Technology for Language Services

Not included

Limited use

Introduced for some use cases

Emphasized for cost-effective compliance

Required for wide implementation (video/phone interpreting)


4. Effective and optimized implementation


Each component in DHS Language Access plan can be broken down into multiple elements which can then be assessed and prioritized, leading to a clear selection of elements that will improve budget efficiency. Good examples of the assessment exercise are: analysis per language based on points of contact with LEP Detainees over a period of time, handbook critical sections which must be readily available in relevant languages to allow for compliance even in future scenarios where detainees from different national origins may be present at the facility at a given time in the future.


5. Consultation with Experts or Legal Counsel:


Given the complexity of compliance with federal and detention-specific standards, facility leadership should consult with legal counsel or compliance experts. These professionals can guide the integration of the DHS Language Access Plan with the PBNDS to ensure full compliance, avoiding legal liabilities and improving service for LEP detainees.


Conclusion:


The applicability of the 2023 DHS Language Access Plan to various PBNDS versions depends on how each edition addresses language services. Facilities operating under PBNDS 2011 and 2019 will generally have more robust requirements in place, while those following earlier standards, such as PBNDS 2000 or 2008, will need to implement additional measures from the DHS plan to meet compliance expectations. Regular assessment and expert consultation are recommended to ensure alignment with both the DHS Language Access Plan and specific PBNDS requirements.


For more details on specific standards, visit:

3 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page